ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · E79E4712 · IMAGE

WAnalyzed by@walena
ZONN Analysis
0

Probably real

More signals lean toward real than AI, but some give weaker readings. Worth a second look on close inspection.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 38/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 1 thing to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

C2PA provenance manifest present

Real evidence

This image carries a Content Authenticity (C2PA) manifest — the source and edit chain are cryptographically verifiable. Typical of professional media and provenance-aware tools.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)read real · 14/100

    BEiT-Large dual-head classifier trained on FLUX, Midjourney, and real photo corpora.

  • CommFor (4803 Generators)read real · 19/100

    CommFor detector trained across 4,803 generator variants for broad coverage.

Model Agreement

71%

Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models6 detectors · mean 35
▸ expand
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
14
CommFor (4803 Generators)
19
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
33
SigLIP AI Detector
39
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
52
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 62
▸ expand
Pixel Analysis
75
Edge Consistency
75
Noise Pattern
70
Color Distribution
64
Compression Quality
55
Error Level Analysis
47
Frequency Analysis
47
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 58
▸ expand
Metadata
62
ICC Profile
62
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
1880 × 837 px
Aspect
2.246
File size
2.73 MB
Bytes / pixel
1.822

Frequency Analysis

Channels nearly identical
Radial0.156
DCT0.587
Upsampling1.000
Cross-channel0.500
Power-law β
-1.91
Grid energy
0.620

Edge Consistency

CV 0.080
Cell 1: 16.0601Cell 2: 18.6669Cell 3: 20.8341Cell 4: 16.3676Cell 5: 18.1014Cell 6: 18.5159Cell 7: 17.7505Cell 8: 19.9953Cell 9: 19.6031Cell 10: 19.0862Cell 11: 19.5478Cell 12: 17.2083Cell 13: 20.0188Cell 14: 19.8815Cell 15: 21.8165Cell 16: 18.0922

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 16.060121.8165

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
42.81
Std deviation
6.54
Mean
-0.0
Spatial corr.
4.719
Mean Δ
2.51
σ
2.01
CV
0.799
Uniformity
0.201

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 18, 2026, 3:47 AM
Analyzed by@walena