Very likely AI-generated
Most signals point to AI generation. Detection tools are not perfect — treat this as a strong indication, not a verdict.
Analysed Specimen
Heads up — 4 things to know
Why this analysis might be off
We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.
Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain
AI evidenceFFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).
ML detectors see this image differently
NoteML scores span a wide range (28–100). Different architectures read different feature spaces; the majority vote strengthens the consensus, but no single model is fully reliable here.
C2PA provenance manifest present
Real evidenceThis image carries a Content Authenticity (C2PA) manifest — the source and edit chain are cryptographically verifiable. Typical of professional media and provenance-aware tools.
No ICC color profile
AI evidenceThe image does not embed an ICC color profile. Real camera files almost always carry sRGB or Adobe RGB profiles — a missing profile is often a sign of generator output or re-encoded media.
Origin Check
Trace this image elsewhere
Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.
Google Lens
Yandex
TinEye
Bing VisualWhy this verdict
- INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)flagged AI · 100/100
BEiT-Large dual-head classifier trained on FLUX, Midjourney, and real photo corpora.
- xRayon ConvNeXtV2flagged AI · 97/100
ConvNeXtV2 detector trained on FLUX, DALL-E 3, SDXL, SD3.5, and Midjourney v6.
Model Agreement
Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.
Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed
What each detector saw
Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.
ML Models6 detectors · mean 66▸ expand▾ collapse
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 50▸ expand▾ collapse
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 58▸ expand▾ collapse
Image Quality
- Dimensions
- 1086 × 1448 px
- Aspect
- 0.750
- File size
- 1.90 MB
- Bytes / pixel
- 1.264
Frequency Analysis
Edge Consistency
Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.
Range: 2.5859 – 11.5344
Noise Fingerprint
- Variance
- 33.42
- Std deviation
- 5.78
- Mean
- -0.0
- Spatial corr.
- 1.869
- Mean Δ
- 1.48
- σ
- 1.61
- CV
- 1.089
- Uniformity
- -0.089