ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · DD772B82 · IMAGE

Analyzed byAnonymous
ZONN Analysis
0

Inconclusive

Signals are mixed or weak. We can't tell with confidence — context, source, and your own judgement matter here.

Signal ConfidenceWeak · 17/100

Analysed Specimen

Analysed content
No flagged regions

Heads up — 3 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Multiple detectors unreachable

Note

4 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Img Cifake, Ml Img Deepfake, Ml Img 3class, Ml Python Siglip). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.

Signals do not converge

Note

Score 49/100 lands in the middle of the inconclusive zone. Detectors did not agree on a story — review multiple lines of evidence below.

Weak overall confidence

Note

Aggregate verdict confidence is 17/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • Error Level Analysisread real · 34/100

    Error Level Analysis. Re-saves and diffs to expose uneven compression regions.

  • Pixel Analysisread real · 35/100

    Low-level pixel statistics: saturation cliffs, channel histograms, banding.

Model Agreement

100%

Variance across 8 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 18 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models8 detectors · mean 50
▸ expand
AI Image Detector
50
Deepfake Detector
50
3-Class Detector
50
SigLIP AI Detector
50
RIGID (DINOv2)
50
Fourier Zero-Shot
50
NPR Artifacts
50
GramNet Texture
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 45
▸ expand
Error Level Analysis
34
Pixel Analysis
35
Color Distribution
35
Noise Pattern
60
Edge Consistency
55
Frequency Analysis
47
Compression Quality
48
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 56
▸ expand
ICC Profile
62
Metadata
55
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
1122 × 1402 px
Aspect
0.800
File size
258.7 KB
Bytes / pixel
0.168

Edge Consistency

CV 0.401
Cell 1: 13.1371Cell 2: 15.5552Cell 3: 17.3567Cell 4: 4.9854Cell 5: 10.7932Cell 6: 28.4578Cell 7: 31.5847Cell 8: 14.0686Cell 9: 8.6380Cell 10: 16.9766Cell 11: 20.3350Cell 12: 14.1662Cell 13: 11.2725Cell 14: 15.4775Cell 15: 16.7695Cell 16: 17.6127

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 4.985431.5847

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
99.18
Std deviation
9.96
Mean
-0.0
Spatial corr.
3.604
Mean Δ
2.64
σ
2.60
CV
0.986
Uniformity
0.014

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 6, 2026, 10:54 PM
Analyzed byAnonymous