ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · D8AB2FBF · IMAGE

ZONN Analysis
0

Probably real

More signals lean toward real than AI, but some give weaker readings. Worth a second look on close inspection.

Signal ConfidenceWeak · 28/100

Analysed Specimen

Analysed content
No flagged regions

Heads up — 3 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Multiple detectors unreachable

Note

2 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Python Siglip, Ml Commfor). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

Weak overall confidence

Note

Aggregate verdict confidence is 28/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Evidence — 12 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

Error Level Analysis
2
Pixel Analysis
17
Frequency Analysis
71
Noise Pattern
66
Metadata
62
ICC Profile
62
Color Distribution
40
Edge Consistency
59
Compression Quality
55
SigLIP AI Detector
50
CommFor (4803 Generators)
50
C2PA Provenance
50

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 10, 2026, 2:41 PM