ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · D8360443 · IMAGE

Analyzed byAnonymous
ZONN Analysis
0

Inconclusive

Signals are mixed or weak. We can't tell with confidence — context, source, and your own judgement matter here.

Signal ConfidenceWeak · 18/100

Analysed Specimen

Analysed content
No flagged regions

Heads up — 3 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Multiple detectors unreachable

Note

4 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Img Cifake, Ml Img Deepfake, Ml Img 3class, Ml Python Siglip). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.

Signals do not converge

Note

Score 51/100 lands in the middle of the inconclusive zone. Detectors did not agree on a story — review multiple lines of evidence below.

Weak overall confidence

Note

Aggregate verdict confidence is 18/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • Error Level Analysisread real · 24/100

    Error Level Analysis. Re-saves and diffs to expose uneven compression regions.

  • Color Distributionread real · 26/100

    Global color distribution shape vs natural-photo baselines.

Model Agreement

100%

Variance across 8 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 18 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models8 detectors · mean 50
▸ expand
AI Image Detector
50
Deepfake Detector
50
3-Class Detector
50
SigLIP AI Detector
50
RIGID (DINOv2)
50
Fourier Zero-Shot
50
NPR Artifacts
50
GramNet Texture
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 46
▸ expand
Error Level Analysis
24
Color Distribution
26
Noise Pattern
68
Pixel Analysis
57
Frequency Analysis
52
Compression Quality
48
Edge Consistency
49
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 44
▸ expand
ICC Profile
35
Metadata
47
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
680 × 543 px
Aspect
1.252
File size
62.0 KB
Bytes / pixel
0.172

Edge Consistency

CV 0.545
Cell 1: 11.1545Cell 2: 14.2389Cell 3: 10.9348Cell 4: 7.2267Cell 5: 23.8964Cell 6: 19.0411Cell 7: 11.8170Cell 8: 6.0020Cell 9: 17.2632Cell 10: 9.2129Cell 11: 9.9317Cell 12: 4.5710Cell 13: 13.5982Cell 14: 4.6329Cell 15: 3.2757Cell 16: 3.0203

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 3.020323.8964

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
83.88
Std deviation
9.16
Mean
-0.0
Spatial corr.
2.536
Mean Δ
1.67
σ
1.90
CV
1.140
Uniformity
-0.140

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 6, 2026, 1:51 PM
Analyzed byAnonymous