ZONN.ai Forensic Report
Case · B9448014 · IMAGE
Inconclusive
Signals are mixed or weak. We can't tell with confidence — context, source, and your own judgement matter here.
Analysed Specimen
Heads up — 3 things to know
Why this analysis might be off
We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.
Multiple detectors unreachable
Note4 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Img Cifake, Ml Img Deepfake, Ml Img 3class, Ml Python Siglip). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.
Signals do not converge
NoteScore 49/100 lands in the middle of the inconclusive zone. Detectors did not agree on a story — review multiple lines of evidence below.
Weak overall confidence
NoteAggregate verdict confidence is 18/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.
Evidence — 18 detectors reviewed
What each detector saw
Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.