ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · A0EF1E5A · IMAGE

ZONN Analysis
0

Probably real

More signals lean toward real than AI, but some give weaker readings. Worth a second look on close inspection.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 50/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 2 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

ML detectors see this image differently

Note

ML scores span a wide range (2–91). Different architectures read different feature spaces; the majority vote strengthens the consensus, but no single model is fully reliable here.

Photo-editor traces in metadata

Note

The file carries traces of a photo editor (Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Lightroom). The image has been edited at some point — this can mean a retouched real photo or AI-generated then post-processed.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

CommFor (4803 Generators)
2
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
3
SigLIP AI Detector
5
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
91
Color Distribution
10
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
15
Noise Pattern
22
ICC Profile
35
Error Level Analysis
40
Frequency Analysis
41
Pixel Analysis
57
Edge Consistency
51
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50
Compression Quality
50
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 14, 2026, 6:17 PM