ZONN.ai Forensic Report
Case · A0EF1E5A · IMAGE
Probably real
More signals lean toward real than AI, but some give weaker readings. Worth a second look on close inspection.
Analysed Specimen
Heads up — 2 things to know
Why this analysis might be off
We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.
ML detectors see this image differently
NoteML scores span a wide range (2–91). Different architectures read different feature spaces; the majority vote strengthens the consensus, but no single model is fully reliable here.
Photo-editor traces in metadata
NoteThe file carries traces of a photo editor (Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Lightroom). The image has been edited at some point — this can mean a retouched real photo or AI-generated then post-processed.
Origin Check
Trace this image elsewhere
Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.
Google Lens
Yandex
TinEye
Bing VisualWhy this verdict
- CommFor (4803 Generators)read real · 2/100
CommFor detector trained across 4,803 generator variants for broad coverage.
- xRayon ConvNeXtV2read real · 3/100
ConvNeXtV2 detector trained on FLUX, DALL-E 3, SDXL, SD3.5, and Midjourney v6.
Model Agreement
Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.
Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed
What each detector saw
Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.
ML Models6 detectors · mean 28▸ expand▾ collapse
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 39▸ expand▾ collapse
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 45▸ expand▾ collapse
Image Quality
- Dimensions
- 377 × 624 px
- Aspect
- 0.604
- File size
- 107.2 KB
- Bytes / pixel
- 0.466
Frequency Analysis
Edge Consistency
Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.
Range: 8.5959 – 52.6165
Noise Fingerprint
- Variance
- 248.81
- Std deviation
- 15.77
- Mean
- -0.0
- Spatial corr.
- 6.790
- Mean Δ
- 2.38
- σ
- 2.14
- CV
- 0.899
- Uniformity
- 0.101