ZONN.ai Forensic Report
Case · 96C09B5B · IMAGE
Inconclusive
Signals are mixed or weak. We can't tell with confidence — context, source, and your own judgement matter here.
Analysed Specimen
Heads up — 4 things to know
Why this analysis might be off
We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.
Multiple detectors unreachable
Note2 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Python Siglip, Ml Commfor). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.
Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain
AI evidenceFFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).
Signals do not converge
NoteScore 47/100 lands in the middle of the inconclusive zone. Detectors did not agree on a story — review multiple lines of evidence below.
Weak overall confidence
NoteAggregate verdict confidence is 32/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.
Origin Check
Trace this image elsewhere
Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.
Google Lens
Yandex
TinEye
Bing VisualWhy this verdict
- INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)flagged AI · 81/100
BEiT-Large dual-head classifier trained on FLUX, Midjourney, and real photo corpora.
- xRayon ConvNeXtV2read real · 19/100
ConvNeXtV2 detector trained on FLUX, DALL-E 3, SDXL, SD3.5, and Midjourney v6.
Model Agreement
Variance across 5 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.
Evidence — 15 detectors reviewed
What each detector saw
Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.
ML Models5 detectors · mean 50▸ expand▾ collapse
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 49▸ expand▾ collapse
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 54▸ expand▾ collapse
Image Quality
- Dimensions
- 1105 × 1423 px
- Aspect
- 0.777
- File size
- 195.4 KB
- Bytes / pixel
- 0.127
Frequency Analysis
Edge Consistency
Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.
Range: 2.7829 – 29.4352
Noise Fingerprint
- Variance
- 85.15
- Std deviation
- 9.23
- Mean
- 0.0
- Spatial corr.
- 2.681
- Mean Δ
- 1.70
- σ
- 1.89
- CV
- 1.113
- Uniformity
- -0.113