ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 929E6F2A · IMAGE

Analyzed byAnonymous
ZONN Analysis
0

Very likely real

Most signals point to a real, human-captured source. Detection tools are not perfect — treat this as a strong indication, not a verdict.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 51/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 1 thing to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Google Lens logoGoogle LensYandex logoYandexTinEye logoTinEyeBing logoBing Visual

Why this verdict

  • CommFor (4803 Generators)read real · 0/100

    CommFor detector trained across 4,803 generator variants for broad coverage.

  • INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)read real · 0/100

    BEiT-Large dual-head classifier trained on FLUX, Midjourney, and real photo corpora.

Model Agreement

65%

Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models6 detectors · mean 15
▸ expand
CommFor (4803 Generators)
0
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
0
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
3
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
14
SigLIP AI Detector
20
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 55
▸ expand
Pixel Analysis
85
Noise Pattern
32
Edge Consistency
65
Color Distribution
39
Frequency Analysis
60
Compression Quality
55
Error Level Analysis
46
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 54
▸ expand
ICC Profile
62
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
559 × 747 px
Aspect
0.748
File size
808.4 KB
Bytes / pixel
1.983

Frequency Analysis

Radial0.776
DCT0.695
Upsampling1.000
Cross-channel0.001
Power-law β
-2.53
Grid energy
0.457

Edge Consistency

CV 0.251
Cell 1: 17.9628Cell 2: 21.2698Cell 3: 19.3464Cell 4: 26.9136Cell 5: 24.8476Cell 6: 21.9746Cell 7: 19.7177Cell 8: 26.5980Cell 9: 21.3501Cell 10: 20.4206Cell 11: 34.1768Cell 12: 24.5847Cell 13: 31.6389Cell 14: 34.8824Cell 15: 40.1862Cell 16: 34.7078

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 17.9628 – 40.1862

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
168.22
Std deviation
12.97
Mean
-0.0
Spatial corr.
6.229
Mean Δ
2.31
σ
1.88
CV
0.815
Uniformity
0.185

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author—
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 30, 2026, 12:50 PM
Analyzed byAnonymous