ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 90FFCE8E · IMAGE

VAnalyzed by@vxqxqxq
ZONN Analysis
0

Inconclusive

Signals are mixed or weak. We can't tell with confidence — context, source, and your own judgement matter here.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 39/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 1 thing to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • xRayon ConvNeXtV2read real · 3/100

    ConvNeXtV2 detector trained on FLUX, DALL-E 3, SDXL, SD3.5, and Midjourney v6.

  • SigLIP AI Detectorflagged AI · 91/100

    SigLIP visual-language model probing semantic vs perceptual coherence.

Model Agreement

45%

Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models6 detectors · mean 44
▸ expand
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
3
SigLIP AI Detector
91
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
28
CommFor (4803 Generators)
33
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
57
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 56
▸ expand
Pixel Analysis
85
Noise Pattern
71
Color Distribution
30
Frequency Analysis
69
Error Level Analysis
34
Compression Quality
48
Edge Consistency
52
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 54
▸ expand
ICC Profile
62
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
1080 × 1512 px
Aspect
0.714
File size
261.4 KB
Bytes / pixel
0.164

Frequency Analysis

Radial1.000
DCT0.709
Upsampling1.000
Cross-channel0.069
Power-law β
-2.97
Grid energy
0.437

Edge Consistency

CV 0.457
Cell 1: 5.6744Cell 2: 27.4124Cell 3: 16.2874Cell 4: 8.5190Cell 5: 6.7380Cell 6: 18.4383Cell 7: 16.9522Cell 8: 10.1302Cell 9: 7.2621Cell 10: 10.1561Cell 11: 8.9190Cell 12: 10.5771Cell 13: 7.4590Cell 14: 14.9407Cell 15: 10.5639Cell 16: 10.8615

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 5.674427.4124

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
66.50
Std deviation
8.15
Mean
-0.0
Spatial corr.
2.996
Mean Δ
1.85
σ
1.83
CV
0.985
Uniformity
0.015

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnAug 31, 2026, 12:07 AM
Analyzed by@vxqxqxq