ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 792C0461 · IMAGE

PAnalyzed by@pic_analyser35
ZONN Analysis
0

Probably real

More signals lean toward real than AI, but some give weaker readings. Worth a second look on close inspection.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 43/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 1 thing to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • SigLIP AI Detectorread real · 1/100

    SigLIP visual-language model probing semantic vs perceptual coherence.

  • Error Level Analysisread real · 4/100

    Error Level Analysis. Re-saves and diffs to expose uneven compression regions.

Model Agreement

45%

Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models6 detectors · mean 37
▸ expand
SigLIP AI Detector
1
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
8
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
84
CommFor (4803 Generators)
35
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
44
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 45
▸ expand
Error Level Analysis
4
Noise Pattern
86
Frequency Analysis
70
Pixel Analysis
35
Color Distribution
35
Edge Consistency
40
Compression Quality
45
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 54
▸ expand
ICC Profile
62
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
383 × 680 px
Aspect
0.563
File size
36.3 KB
Bytes / pixel
0.143

Frequency Analysis

Radial1.000
DCT0.806
Upsampling1.000
Cross-channel0.009
Power-law β
-3.18
Grid energy
0.290

Edge Consistency

CV 0.789
Cell 1: 0.0966Cell 2: 5.9954Cell 3: 12.2295Cell 4: 1.0181Cell 5: 0.2516Cell 6: 7.3431Cell 7: 12.3555Cell 8: 3.6674Cell 9: 0.2073Cell 10: 6.9429Cell 11: 9.5232Cell 12: 0.7458Cell 13: 3.7932Cell 14: 6.1963Cell 15: 7.8323Cell 16: 3.0427

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 0.096612.3555

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
37.34
Std deviation
6.11
Mean
-0.0
Spatial corr.
1.086
Mean Δ
0.82
σ
1.17
CV
1.433
Uniformity
-0.433

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 20, 2026, 5:21 PM
Analyzed by@pic_analyser35