ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 73503541 · IMAGE

Analyzed byAnonymous
ZONN Analysis
0

Inconclusive

Signals are mixed or weak. We can't tell with confidence — context, source, and your own judgement matter here.

Signal ConfidenceWeak · 19/100

Analysed Specimen

Analysed content
No flagged regions

Heads up — 3 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Multiple detectors unreachable

Note

4 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Img Cifake, Ml Img Deepfake, Ml Img 3class, Ml Python Siglip). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.

Just above the real threshold

Note

The score (43/100) is between real (40) and inconclusive. There is not enough confidence to call this a clean "real" verdict.

Weak overall confidence

Note

Aggregate verdict confidence is 19/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • Error Level Analysisread real · 24/100

    Error Level Analysis. Re-saves and diffs to expose uneven compression regions.

  • Noise Patternread real · 31/100

    Sensor-noise (PRNU) fingerprint check. Real cameras leave camera-unique noise.

Model Agreement

100%

Variance across 8 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 18 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models8 detectors · mean 50
▸ expand
AI Image Detector
50
Deepfake Detector
50
3-Class Detector
50
SigLIP AI Detector
50
RIGID (DINOv2)
50
Fourier Zero-Shot
50
NPR Artifacts
50
GramNet Texture
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 38
▸ expand
Error Level Analysis
24
Noise Pattern
31
Pixel Analysis
35
Color Distribution
36
Frequency Analysis
42
Edge Consistency
47
Compression Quality
48
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 56
▸ expand
ICC Profile
62
Metadata
55
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
1108 × 1419 px
Aspect
0.781
File size
247.2 KB
Bytes / pixel
0.161

Edge Consistency

CV 0.593
Cell 1: 3.8931Cell 2: 10.9617Cell 3: 12.7422Cell 4: 4.7484Cell 5: 16.4549Cell 6: 43.8005Cell 7: 38.8611Cell 8: 11.6848Cell 9: 20.4828Cell 10: 34.3990Cell 11: 13.5477Cell 12: 14.1272Cell 13: 24.4719Cell 14: 32.7007Cell 15: 11.0364Cell 16: 20.7612

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 3.893143.8005

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
195.33
Std deviation
13.98
Mean
-0.0
Spatial corr.
4.740
Mean Δ
2.14
σ
2.42
CV
1.133
Uniformity
-0.133

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 6, 2026, 10:55 PM
Analyzed byAnonymous