ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 732C147D · IMAGE

ZONN Analysis
0

Probably real

More signals lean toward real than AI, but some give weaker readings. Worth a second look on close inspection.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 38/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 2 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

One detector was unreachable

Note

Ml Python Siglip did not respond during this analysis. The other detectors ran normally.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
6
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
81
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
19
Error Level Analysis
26
Frequency Analysis
73
Noise Pattern
68
Edge Consistency
35
Color Distribution
37
ICC Profile
62
CommFor (4803 Generators)
39
Pixel Analysis
57
Compression Quality
45
SigLIP AI Detector
50
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 13, 2026, 4:22 PM