ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 6835A46F · IMAGE

ZONN Analysis
0

Very likely real

Most signals point to a real, human-captured source. Detection tools are not perfect — treat this as a strong indication, not a verdict.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 51/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 2 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

AI generator fingerprints detected

AI evidence

Frequency analysis (FFT score 70/100) shows modern diffusion-style upsampling patterns, but the ML models say "real". This combination is a known blind spot for newer generators (SDXL, FLUX, Midjourney v6) — the verdict above may be misleading.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

CommFor (4803 Generators)
0
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
0
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
3
SigLIP AI Detector
10
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
12
Color Distribution
14
Error Level Analysis
30
Noise Pattern
70
Frequency Analysis
70
ICC Profile
62
Compression Quality
40
Pixel Analysis
45
Edge Consistency
49
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 14, 2026, 6:19 PM