ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 61553485 · IMAGE

ZONN Analysis
0

Very likely AI-generated

Most signals point to AI generation. Detection tools are not perfect — treat this as a strong indication, not a verdict.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 51/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 2 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

ML detectors see this image differently

Note

ML scores span a wide range (0–100). Different architectures read different feature spaces; the majority vote strengthens the consensus, but no single model is fully reliable here.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

CommFor (4803 Generators)
0
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
100
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
98
SigLIP AI Detector
90
Color Distribution
17
Noise Pattern
78
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
76
Error Level Analysis
25
Frequency Analysis
75
ICC Profile
35
Compression Quality
56
Pixel Analysis
45
Edge Consistency
47
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 15, 2026, 8:24 AM