ZONN.ai Forensic Report
Case · 4984B5E8 · IMAGE · X
Inconclusive
Signals are mixed or weak. We can't tell with confidence — context, source, and your own judgement matter here.
Analysed Specimen
Heads up — 5 things to know
Why this analysis might be off
We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.
Multiple detectors unreachable
Note4 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Img Cifake, Ml Img Deepfake, Ml Img 3class, Ml Python Siglip). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.
Just below the AI threshold
NoteThe score (55/100) is right at the boundary between inconclusive and AI (60). A single signal flip could swing the verdict — treat this as suggestive rather than definitive.
Uneven compression (ELA)
AI evidenceELA coefficient of variation is 2.24 — different regions show noticeably different compression levels. Common with composites, edits, or AI generations.
Weak overall confidence
NoteAggregate verdict confidence is 19/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.
No ICC color profile
AI evidenceThe image does not embed an ICC color profile. Real camera files almost always carry sRGB or Adobe RGB profiles — a missing profile is often a sign of generator output or re-encoded media.
Origin Check
Trace this image elsewhere
Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.
Google Lens
Yandex
TinEye
Bing VisualWhy this verdict
- Error Level Analysisread real · 0/100
Error Level Analysis. Re-saves and diffs to expose uneven compression regions.
- Color Distributionread real · 2/100
Global color distribution shape vs natural-photo baselines.
Model Agreement
Variance across 8 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.
Evidence — 18 detectors reviewed
What each detector saw
Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.
ML Models8 detectors · mean 50▸ expand▾ collapse
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 34▸ expand▾ collapse
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 56▸ expand▾ collapse
Image Quality
- Dimensions
- 2626 × 1474 px
- Aspect
- 1.782
- File size
- 247.3 KB
- Bytes / pixel
- 0.065
Edge Consistency
Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.
Range: 0.0000 – 17.7186
Noise Fingerprint
- Variance
- 59.40
- Std deviation
- 7.71
- Mean
- -0.0
- Spatial corr.
- 1.615
- Mean Δ
- 1.25
- σ
- 2.81
- CV
- 2.238
- Uniformity
- -1.238