ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 4614D982 · IMAGE

VAnalyzed by@vxqxqxq
ZONN Analysis
0

Probably AI-generated

More signals lean toward AI generation than real, but some give weaker readings. Treat with caution.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 42/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 1 thing to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • xRayon ConvNeXtV2flagged AI · 97/100

    ConvNeXtV2 detector trained on FLUX, DALL-E 3, SDXL, SD3.5, and Midjourney v6.

  • Noise Patternflagged AI · 87/100

    Sensor-noise (PRNU) fingerprint check. Real cameras leave camera-unique noise.

Model Agreement

46%

Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models6 detectors · mean 43
▸ expand
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
97
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
16
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
18
CommFor (4803 Generators)
35
SigLIP AI Detector
42
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 51
▸ expand
Noise Pattern
87
Color Distribution
20
Frequency Analysis
72
Error Level Analysis
30
Edge Consistency
56
Pixel Analysis
45
Compression Quality
45
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 39
▸ expand
ICC Profile
18
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
1334 × 1780 px
Aspect
0.749
File size
214.3 KB
Bytes / pixel
0.092

Frequency Analysis

Radial1.000
DCT0.864
Upsampling1.000
Cross-channel0.027
Power-law β
-4.13
Grid energy
0.204

Edge Consistency

CV 0.385
Cell 1: 5.9335Cell 2: 6.5136Cell 3: 4.8948Cell 4: 2.2197Cell 5: 4.2472Cell 6: 8.3754Cell 7: 6.7598Cell 8: 2.5516Cell 9: 7.1833Cell 10: 9.2448Cell 11: 10.7060Cell 12: 4.6937Cell 13: 3.8818Cell 14: 3.9291Cell 15: 6.0718Cell 16: 6.7000

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 2.219710.7060

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
31.55
Std deviation
5.62
Mean
0.0
Spatial corr.
1.326
Mean Δ
1.04
σ
1.09
CV
1.056
Uniformity
-0.056

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnAug 30, 2026, 11:20 PM
Analyzed by@vxqxqxq