ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 42FCCE31 · IMAGE

Analyzed byAnonymous
ZONN Analysis
0

Very likely real

Most signals point to a real, human-captured source. Detection tools are not perfect — treat this as a strong indication, not a verdict.

Signal ConfidenceLimited · 39/100

Analysed Specimen

Original analysed image
Forensic suspicion heatmap
OriginalHeatmap
POS55/100
No flagged regions

Heads up — 2 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Upsampling artifacts in the frequency domain

AI evidence

FFT analysis found strong upsampling patterns — a fingerprint of diffusion-model VAE decoders (latent → pixel-space upscale).

Uneven compression (ELA)

AI evidence

ELA coefficient of variation is 2.49 — different regions show noticeably different compression levels. Common with composites, edits, or AI generations.

Origin Check

Trace this image elsewhere

Cross-reference the source against major reverse-image services. Each link opens in a new tab with the image URL preloaded — ZONN.ai does not re-upload the image.

Why this verdict

  • Error Level Analysisread real · 0/100

    Error Level Analysis. Re-saves and diffs to expose uneven compression regions.

  • SigLIP AI Detectorread real · 1/100

    SigLIP visual-language model probing semantic vs perceptual coherence.

Model Agreement

60%

Variance across 6 ML detectors. Higher agreement means the models converged on the same reading; lower agreement means treat the verdict with care.

Evidence — 16 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

ML Models6 detectors · mean 33
▸ expand
SigLIP AI Detector
1
xRayon ConvNeXtV2
14
INA v2 (FLUX/MJ)
29
CommFor (4803 Generators)
55
Bombek1 SigLIP+DINOv2
48
Manipulation Map (IML-ViT)
50
Pixel & Frequency Forensics7 detectors · mean 43
▸ expand
Error Level Analysis
0
Color Distribution
1
Noise Pattern
87
Frequency Analysis
72
Edge Consistency
35
Pixel Analysis
57
Compression Quality
50
Provenance & Metadata3 detectors · mean 45
▸ expand
ICC Profile
35
Metadata
50
C2PA Provenance
50

Image Quality

Dimensions
336 × 336 px
Aspect
1.000
File size
6.9 KB
Bytes / pixel
0.063

Frequency Analysis

Radial1.000
DCT0.798
Upsampling1.000
Cross-channel0.079
Power-law β
-4.14
Grid energy
0.304

Edge Consistency

CV 1.063
Cell 1: 0.0156Cell 2: 1.6907Cell 3: 1.9212Cell 4: 0.0181Cell 5: 1.6879Cell 6: 6.0098Cell 7: 7.0245Cell 8: 0.2549Cell 9: 0.2769Cell 10: 7.4272Cell 11: 7.0471Cell 12: 0.0000Cell 13: 0.0000Cell 14: 7.6402Cell 15: 6.3337Cell 16: 0.0000

Per-region edge density (4 × 4 grid). Uneven distribution may indicate localized editing or splicing; uniform fields are typical of fully synthetic outputs.

Range: 0.00007.6402

Noise Fingerprint

Variance
41.44
Std deviation
6.44
Mean
0.0
Spatial corr.
0.728
Mean Δ
0.49
σ
1.21
CV
2.489
Uniformity
-1.489

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnJun 4, 2026, 7:44 PM
Analyzed byAnonymous