ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 2F4E3249 · TEXT

ZONN Analysis
0

Probably AI-generated

More signals lean toward AI generation than real, but some give weaker readings. Treat with caution.

Signal ConfidenceWeak · 5/100
ye kadar gördüğümüz en korkutucu bakışı yüzünden viral oluyor.

Heads up — 2 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Multiple detectors unreachable

Note

4 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Modernbert, Ml Roberta, Ml Tmr, Ml Python Desklib). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.

Weak overall confidence

Note

Aggregate verdict confidence is 5/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.

Evidence — 11 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this texta score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

Burstiness
100
Punctuation
50
Readability
50
ModernBERT (GPT-4/Claude)
50
RoBERTa (GPT-2)
50
TMR Detector (RAID)
50
DeBERTa RAID #1
50
Perplexity
50
Vocabulary Richness
50
N-gram Repetition
50
Entropy
50

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typetext
Analyzed OnMay 15, 2026, 10:45 AM
Text AI Detection Report — Probably AI-generated (84/100) | ZONN.ai