ZONN.ai Forensic Report

Case · 1D9E8B40 · IMAGE

ZONN Analysis
0

Probably real

More signals lean toward real than AI, but some give weaker readings. Worth a second look on close inspection.

Signal ConfidenceWeak · 20/100

Analysed Specimen

Analysed content
No flagged regions

Heads up — 2 things to know

Why this analysis might be off

We highlight every disagreement and unusual signal we found so you can judge for yourself. Stronger warnings come first; informational notes are at the bottom.

Multiple detectors unreachable

Note

4 ML detectors did not respond (Ml Img Cifake, Ml Img Deepfake, Ml Img 3class, Ml Python Siglip). The verdict was computed with reduced evidence; reliability is lower than usual.

Weak overall confidence

Note

Aggregate verdict confidence is 20/100. Several detectors returned uncertain answers or were offline. Read the verdict as a guideline, not as a final answer.

Evidence — 18 detectors reviewed

What each detector saw

Each detector independently gave this imagea score from 0 (definitely real) to 100 (definitely AI). The score above is their weighted consensus — detectors with higher confidence count more. No single detector decides; you read the spread.

Noise Pattern
8
Color Distribution
15
Frequency Analysis
29
Pixel Analysis
35
ICC Profile
62
Error Level Analysis
38
Edge Consistency
60
Metadata
59
AI Image Detector
50
Deepfake Detector
50
3-Class Detector
50
SigLIP AI Detector
50
RIGID (DINOv2)
50
Fourier Zero-Shot
50
NPR Artifacts
50
GramNet Texture
50
C2PA Provenance
50
Compression Quality
50

Provenance

Source Dossier

PlatformDirect upload
Author
Content Typeimage
Analyzed OnMay 5, 2026, 9:52 PM